<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEO 101 &#8211; A Brief Intro to the Basics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.emonetized.com/26/seo-101-a-brief-intro-to-the-basics/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.emonetized.com/26/seo-101-a-brief-intro-to-the-basics</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 05:08:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nora</title>
		<link>http://www.emonetized.com/26/seo-101-a-brief-intro-to-the-basics/comment-page-1#comment-3226</link>
		<dc:creator>Nora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 08:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emonetized.com/26/seo-101-a-brief-intro-to-the-basics/#comment-3226</guid>
		<description>Thank you for sharing us with these useful information.They are so valuable in my everyday work.  Links are significant. I agree with you totally. However, adding links are a difficult problem for me at times. I do not know why. Anything wrong with speed or website? The only way I adopted is trying it for several times. So time-wasting, right?  Would you explain it to me more clearly? Thank you sincerely!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for sharing us with these useful information.They are so valuable in my everyday work.  Links are significant. I agree with you totally. However, adding links are a difficult problem for me at times. I do not know why. Anything wrong with speed or website? The only way I adopted is trying it for several times. So time-wasting, right?  Would you explain it to me more clearly? Thank you sincerely!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Understanding Quality Links</title>
		<link>http://www.emonetized.com/26/seo-101-a-brief-intro-to-the-basics/comment-page-1#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>Understanding Quality Links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 15:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emonetized.com/26/seo-101-a-brief-intro-to-the-basics/#comment-216</guid>
		<description>[...] while you&#8217;re evaluating a potential link. It&#8217;s important to see the big picture beyond SEO Would you still want that link if there was no such thing as a search engine? If the answer is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] while you&#8217;re evaluating a potential link. It&#8217;s important to see the big picture beyond SEO Would you still want that link if there was no such thing as a search engine? If the answer is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Sticks</title>
		<link>http://www.emonetized.com/26/seo-101-a-brief-intro-to-the-basics/comment-page-1#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Sticks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 17:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emonetized.com/26/seo-101-a-brief-intro-to-the-basics/#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Thank Tim for the reply. 

But I&#039;m still confused about this, I&#039;m going to explain more:

lets assume that my website can get only one link from a website. I have 2 options to either take a link from website xxx.com which I already have a link from it. or to take a link from yyy.com which I don&#039;t have any links from it. (lets assume that both websites have the same value and PR).

You will say, I prefer to take a link from yyy.com (different domain). But SEO wise, do you think that getting the link from xxx.com instead will be much worse than the link from yyy.com ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank Tim for the reply. </p>
<p>But I&#8217;m still confused about this, I&#8217;m going to explain more:</p>
<p>lets assume that my website can get only one link from a website. I have 2 options to either take a link from website xxx.com which I already have a link from it. or to take a link from yyy.com which I don&#8217;t have any links from it. (lets assume that both websites have the same value and PR).</p>
<p>You will say, I prefer to take a link from yyy.com (different domain). But SEO wise, do you think that getting the link from xxx.com instead will be much worse than the link from yyy.com ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jake</title>
		<link>http://www.emonetized.com/26/seo-101-a-brief-intro-to-the-basics/comment-page-1#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 17:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emonetized.com/26/seo-101-a-brief-intro-to-the-basics/#comment-41</guid>
		<description> is not a meta tag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is not a meta tag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Schroeder</title>
		<link>http://www.emonetized.com/26/seo-101-a-brief-intro-to-the-basics/comment-page-1#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Schroeder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 11:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emonetized.com/26/seo-101-a-brief-intro-to-the-basics/#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Hi Tony!

Getting a couple of links from different pages of the same website is fine. 

One thing I&#039;d avoid though is buying &quot;site-wide&quot; links from thousands of pages on the same website (especially if you have a new website). You want your links to appear as natural as possible. If Google finds a new website which all of a sudden has 10,000 links from one website linking to it, it&#039;s probably going to raise some red flags. Most times it won&#039;t necessarily get you penalized but it&#039;s not going to help either.

I&#039;d be looking for links from multiple domains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tony!</p>
<p>Getting a couple of links from different pages of the same website is fine. </p>
<p>One thing I&#8217;d avoid though is buying &#8220;site-wide&#8221; links from thousands of pages on the same website (especially if you have a new website). You want your links to appear as natural as possible. If Google finds a new website which all of a sudden has 10,000 links from one website linking to it, it&#8217;s probably going to raise some red flags. Most times it won&#8217;t necessarily get you penalized but it&#8217;s not going to help either.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be looking for links from multiple domains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Sticks</title>
		<link>http://www.emonetized.com/26/seo-101-a-brief-intro-to-the-basics/comment-page-1#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Sticks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 07:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emonetized.com/26/seo-101-a-brief-intro-to-the-basics/#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the great article. I just wish I&#039;ve read this 1 year ago. However, I have a question. If you&#039;re doing some link exchange. Is it good to get more than one link from a single website? or you should try looking for links from different websites (different domains)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great article. I just wish I&#8217;ve read this 1 year ago. However, I have a question. If you&#8217;re doing some link exchange. Is it good to get more than one link from a single website? or you should try looking for links from different websites (different domains)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

